Direct answer: AWG (American Wire Gauge) and mm² (square millimeters, the IEC cross-sectional area) are two ways to size a conductor. AWG uses a reverse scale — the smaller the gauge number, the larger the wire; mm² states the actual area directly. Use the chart below to convert instantly: for example 12 AWG ≈ 3.31 mm², 24 AWG ≈ 0.51 mm², and 6 mm² ≈ 9–10 AWG. Always confirm ampacity and insulation with the relevant standard (UL, IEC) before finalizing a design.
Try it live: AWG ↔ mm² Converter & Wire Size Chart
1. AWG → mm² Conversion Table
| AWG | Cross-section (mm²) | Diameter (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | 0.0497 | 0.079 |
| 38 | 0.0824 | 0.102 |
| 36 | 0.127 | 0.127 |
| 34 | 0.202 | 0.160 |
| 32 | 0.324 | 0.203 |
| 30 | 0.510 | 0.255 |
| 28 | 0.810 | 0.321 |
| 26 | 1.31 | 0.404 |
| 24 | 2.08 | 0.511 |
| 22 | 3.31 | 0.644 |
| 20 | 5.26 | 0.812 |
| 18 | 8.37 | 1.024 |
| 16 | 13.3 | 1.291 |
| 14 | 21.2 | 1.628 |
| 12 | 33.6 | 2.053 |
| 10 | 53.5 | 2.588 |
| 8 | 84.9 | 3.264 |
| 6 | 133.4 | 4.115 |
| 4 | 212.8 | 5.189 |
| 2 | 337.7 | 6.544 |
| 1 | 426.7 | 7.348 |
| 1/0 (0) | 537.4 | 8.251 |
| 2/0 (00) | 677.4 | 9.266 |
| 3/0 (000) | 853.6 | 10.40 |
| 4/0 (0000) | 1075.7 | 11.68 |
2. mm² → Nearest AWG (IEC to AWG Quick Reference)
| mm² | Nearest AWG | mm² | Nearest AWG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 24 | 10 | 7–8 |
| 0.34 | 22 | 16 | 5–6 |
| 0.5 | 20 | 25 | 3–4 |
| 0.75 | 18 | 35 | 2–1 |
| 1.0 | 17 | 50 | 0–1 |
| 1.5 | 15–16 | 70 | 00 |
| 2.5 | 13–14 | 95 | 000 |
| 4 | 11–12 | 120 | 0000 |
| 6 | 9–10 | — | — |
3. Selection Notes (Don't Size on Area Alone)
- Ampacity differs by standard: the same mm² carries different current under UL (60°C/75°C/90°C ratings) vs IEC (depending on insulation and installation method). The chart gives geometry, not a current rating — look up the relevant table.
- Insulation thickness scales with size: larger conductors need thicker insulation/jacket for the same voltage class; don't assume a thin-wall PV or building wire fits a bigger core.
- Stranding matters: fine-stranded cable (class 5/6) is more flexible than solid or class 1/2; for movable or vibration-prone runs prefer flexible stranding even at the same mm².
- Shielding for signals: for data/control pairs, AWG alone doesn't capture pair twist, shield coverage or characteristic impedance — specify those separately.
4. Common Conversion Questions
- 12 AWG to mm²? ≈ 3.31 mm² (a very common solar/branch-circuit size).
- 24 AWG to mm²? ≈ 0.51 mm² (typical for low-current signal/telecom).
- 6 mm² to AWG? ≈ 9–10 AWG.
- 1.5 mm² to AWG? ≈ 15–16 AWG (building-wire staple).
FAQ
Q1: Is AWG bigger or smaller when the number is smaller?
A: Smaller number = bigger wire. AWG is a reverse logarithmic scale: 4 AWG is much thicker than 24 AWG. mm² is linear — bigger number = bigger area. That's why 12 AWG (3.31 mm²) is "smaller" than 6 mm² even though 6 > 3.31 in area.
Q2: Can I directly substitute mm² for AWG in a design?
A: Only as a starting point. Match the nearest area, then verify ampacity, insulation temperature rating and installation method against the applicable standard (UL or IEC). A close area can still have a different current rating.
Q3: Why does the same mm² have a range of nearest AWG?
A: AWG steps are fixed (every 3 steps ≈ 2× area), so IEC sizes like 1.5 mm² fall between 15 and 16 AWG. Pick the AWG whose area is ≥ your required mm², then confirm the current rating covers the load.
Q4: Does this chart apply to both solid and stranded wire?
A: The cross-sectional area is the same; only the physical diameter and flexibility differ (stranded is slightly larger in overall diameter). Ampacity is set by area and insulation, not by solid vs stranded of the same mm².
Q5: Where do I get a live, instant conversion instead of the table?
A: Use our AWG ↔ mm² Converter — enter any AWG, mm² or diameter and it returns the other two values and snaps to the nearest standard size.
Need a cable sized to your exact AWG/mm² spec? Chat with the engineer on WhatsApp → WhatsApp Inquiry